Forty-seven days into a war that has killed more than 3,300 Iranians, rattled global energy markets, pushed oil past $100 a barrel, and upended the geopolitical order of the Middle East, President Donald Trump stood before reporters at the White House on Thursday and said something that no one was entirely sure they could believe: the conflict with Iran was “very close to over.”
More specifically, Trump claimed that Iran had agreed to hand over what he called its “nuclear dust” — the enriched uranium stockpiles buried deep underground that Washington has consistently demanded Tehran relinquish as a non-negotiable condition of any deal. Speaking in characteristically vivid terms, Trump said Iran had “agreed to give us back the nuclear dust that’s way underground” and described their commitment as “very powerful.” On the question of a 20-year limit on enrichment, he was emphatic: “There is no 20-year limit.”
The statements, delivered with the confidence of a man announcing a transaction rather than concluding a negotiation, were greeted with cautious optimism in some quarters — and considerable scepticism in others. Iran’s foreign ministry had said just one day earlier that its right to enrich uranium was “indisputable,” while conceding the level of enrichment was “negotiable.” Those two positions are not obviously reconcilable. And the gap between a Trump tarmac announcement and a signed, verified international agreement has proven wide before.
How We Got Here
The Iran war began on February 28, when the United States and Israel launched coordinated strikes against Iranian nuclear and military infrastructure. What followed was six weeks of escalation: Iranian missile barrages against Israel and Gulf states, the militarisation of the Strait of Hormuz — through which a fifth of the world’s oil flows — and a US naval blockade that has “completely halted economic trade going into and out of Iran by sea,” according to US Central Command. Turned-back ships numbered at least ten in the blockade’s first 48 hours.
On April 7, with Trump warning that “a whole civilization will die tonight” if a deal was not reached by midnight, Pakistan brokered a two-week ceasefire with just under two hours to spare. The ceasefire — fragile from the first moment — set the stage for formal in-person negotiations. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif invited both delegations to Islamabad to “settle all disputes.”
The first round of talks in Islamabad collapsed after 21 hours. Vice President JD Vance, who led the US delegation, said Iran “moved in our direction, but they didn’t move far enough.” The sticking point was the same one it has always been: uranium enrichment. Iranian negotiators were not authorised to accept terms on the nuclear question without returning to Tehran for approval, a process that consumed what negotiating momentum had been built. After the talks fell apart, the White House announced a naval blockade. “After 21 hours of negotiations, the Iranians chose the pursuit of a nuclear weapon over peace,” a White House spokesperson told TIME magazine.
The Role of Pakistan — and the Pursuit of Round Two
In the absence of direct diplomatic relations between Washington and Tehran, Pakistan has emerged as the indispensable intermediary of this crisis. Field Marshal Asim Munir, Pakistan’s powerful army chief, has been shuttling between capitals carrying messages that neither side will formally acknowledge. On Wednesday, Munir arrived in Tehran and met with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. On Thursday, the Pakistani delegation met with Iranian parliamentary speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf — who had led Iran’s delegation at the failed Islamabad talks — for what Iranian state media described as “detailed discussions regarding the messages exchanged between Iran and the United States since Sunday.”
The White House said Thursday that further talks “would very likely” be in Islamabad, though Pakistan’s foreign ministry cautioned that no date had been set. Turkey has also stepped forward as an additional intermediary. The shape of a potential second round is visible; the substance of what it would need to resolve remains deeply contested.
Iran’s UN ambassador offered the diplomatic community’s most cautiously worded ray of hope: Tehran was “cautiously optimistic” about peace talks, he said, expressing hope for a “meaningful outcome.” That phrase — cautiously optimistic — captures exactly where the diplomacy stands. Neither side has walked away. Neither side has agreed to the terms that would end the war.
The Competing Demands
The distance between the two parties’ stated positions remains substantial. The US 15-point proposal, delivered to Iran via Pakistan in March, demanded an end to Iran’s nuclear program, limits on its ballistic missile capabilities, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, restrictions on Iran’s support for armed proxy groups, and sanctions relief as consideration. Iran’s counter 10-point proposal requested a guarantee against future attacks, the lifting of all sanctions, an end to Israeli strikes against Hezbollah in Lebanon, and a $2 million fee per ship for Hormuz passage — a formulation Washington found unacceptable.
The nuclear question is the load-bearing wall of any potential agreement. Iran has enriched uranium to 60% purity in recent years — well above what is needed for civilian energy but below weapons-grade levels. Tehran has consistently insisted, including in these negotiations, that its enrichment program is peaceful and its right to maintain it “indisputable.” What changed this week, if Trump’s characterisation is accurate, is that Iran has agreed to surrender its stockpiles. That would be a significant concession — but surrendering existing stockpiles is meaningfully different from permanently abandoning the enrichment program entirely.
Vance’s “grand bargain” framing suggests the US is offering something substantial in return: sanctions relief, economic reopening, and a security guarantee. Israel’s defence minister Israel Katz said Iran was “standing at a historic crossroads,” warning that not pursuing a deal “leads to an abyss.” Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth struck a harder tone: “If Iran chooses poorly, then they will have a blockade and bombs dropping on infrastructure, power and energy.”
Markets and the World Are Watching
The stakes beyond the negotiating room are immense. The two-week ceasefire that expires around April 21 has barely held: Iran’s armed forces threatened to block shipping from the Persian Gulf, the Sea of Oman, and the Red Sea if the US naval blockade continued. The Strait of Hormuz remained effectively closed even after the ceasefire was announced, with Iranian officials acknowledging that mines laid during hostilities had not been fully located or cleared.
Oil, which had traded near $70 a barrel before the war began, has remained stubbornly above $90 even as ceasefire optimism has partially eased the crisis premium. The S&P 500 hit a record high of 7,022 on Wednesday — a rally that has erased all the war’s equity market losses — but the underlying economic damage from six weeks of Hormuz disruption, supply chain stress, and inflation acceleration has not been unwound. The IMF cut its 2026 global growth forecast to 3.1% and warned that its “adverse scenario” — now considered increasingly likely — puts growth at 2.5%.
A deal that ends the war, reopens Hormuz, and removes the threat of resumed bombardment would represent one of the most consequential diplomatic achievements of the Trump presidency. The financial markets have already begun pricing some of that outcome in. Whether the diplomatic machinery can close the distance between Trump’s confident pronouncements and Iran’s measured statements in the time available — with a ceasefire expiring in days and a blockade intensifying the pressure — is the question that the next round of talks in Islamabad will need to answer.
The two sides are closer than they were a month ago. They are not yet close enough.
Written by Shalin Soni, CMA specializing in financial analysis, global markets, and corporate strategy, with hands-on experience in financial planning and analytical decision-making.
ALSO READ
• Musk Demands ‘Light Speed’ Execution for Ambitious Chipmaking Strategy
• Xi Jinping Says the World Order Is Crumbling and He’s Ready to Fill the Gap
• 21 Hours, No Deal: Inside the Historic US-Iran Peace Talks That Ended in Islamabad
Source: Based on Time Magazine and publicly available information.